Quote:
Originally posted by NotFromHere
Oh yeah, that's the best part. Seeing the crying in the limo scene - it's what I waited for. At first I thought Kirsten wasn't going to cry - because she has no feelings - and then when that first little tear dribbled down her cheeks - ah yes, a good moment in TV. No one deserved to cry in the limo more than that chick. You have to ask yourself - if a person doesn't get along with ANY women - is it her or them?
His parents said that they believed in love at first sight - having gotten engaged after 2 weeks of dating. So they were really on board with this concept. As for the $$ the sisters and brothers made it seem like all their $$ was tied up in the winery and that they weren't "trust fund babies" with money coming out their asses. And they truly seemed like hard working, down to earth people. However, the publicity for the winery - priceless.
|
As for the first part- some of us actually have an interest in specuilating about how long the relationship will last and have seen enough limo meltdowns to not get off on that sort of thing. For me the social and matchmaking aspects are far more interstings than watching some chick with a bad nose job have meltdown (again).
I read the recap on ABC and apparentlyu Mister ANdrew cut a check for over 48 grand for this ring without batting an eye. I dont know about you but I certainly dont have that kind of money kicking around in a checking account. Us non-heir types have to invest in things that bear interest and such. And wealth is all relative anyway- I am sure the Firestones feel merely uppermiddle class compared to those pesky Forbes nd Murdochs. The point about my being surprised about the parents being on board is taht it surprises me that ultra rich people would allow cameras around their premises- for security and privacy reasons. Plus, its just downright tacky isnt it debtslave? Wouldnt old money types be appaled by this sort of publicity whoring? Thats why I think they have to be thinking about selling Firestone wines.
