LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,056
0 members and 1,056 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-30-2004, 06:41 PM   #3393
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Scary Hilary Quote

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
By that point, we'd have to be sticking it to them like Robert Mugabe. That might fly in Africa, but not around here.

IF you're going to call it only an intergenerational tranfer then, yes, there's not much benefit, except some limited admin savings costs, that privatization will get you. But that's not the only debate--part of the debate is whether people should be forced to take some responsibility for their retirement savings in the form of investing themselves in a limited set of options.
Didn't they recently find that for-profit (i.e., very market-driven) hospitals were less efficient than non-profit ones? I'm not convinced that changing to private admin would make things better. They'd start paying some jackass CEO an enormous amount of money and hire a bunch of over-paid useless consultants.
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.