LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 285
0 members and 285 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-01-2004, 02:37 PM   #3488
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Let's get it on!

Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
This argument is always leveled against Democrats. Ty's response, that he'd rather have someone who's been there, was the exact argument used by Republicans in 92 and 96 with Clinton, but to the opposite conclusion: Clinton was a "draft dodger" and so wouldn't fight.

Clinton sent troops to the Balkins and Somalia. Carter sent in troops to rescue Iran's hostages (albeit in an utter failure), not to mention the covert opperation in Southeast Asia. The troops in Vietnam were sent not by a Republican, but by Kennedy and Johnson. It was Truman who sent troops to Korea. Roosevelt lead us through WWII. Wilson got us into WWI. On the "which party is more likely to have the resolve to commit troops" question, it's a wash.
At first i thought that, then I changed my mine.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM.