Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
But if they didn't disclose known general threats, and an attack occured, they'd be subject to critism for withholding information.
|
Lefty here attacks the administration for A.
You say, but if the administration had done not A, you would have attacked that, too. Implicitly, then, the attack on A has nothing to do with the substance of A, and really just reflects a blind propensity to attack the administration.
(1) Get a macro already.
(2) Why you think this is convincing, or even worth the electrons, is beyond me.
