Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
No. The White House tells Novak that as far as it's concerned, the background protection (AG knows more about this than I do, but I don't think there's a privilege here) is waived, and that he's free to name names, and should do so. That's all. If Bush really wanted the culprits identified, he'd be doing more than he is. Some top White House officials are criminals who exposed a covert operative, and he doesn't seem particularly bothered by this.
You are technically correct, but I thought that Republicans didn't think much of defendants who rely on technicalities.
|
Wait a second. Although I grant you that I do not support the conduct, criminals are those that actually committed a crime. You say in one breadth that they are criminals and in another that an actual crime may not have been committed. Which is it? I think we all can agree that this is not condonable behavior.
