Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Right. I point out articles that he lied, and you finally concede the fact when one of your guys concedes the point.
And so what - the What is that it finally lays to rest the claims of a spotlight-stealing blowhard for the left.
|
The only "lie" he's been caught in so far is about how he received the assignment to investigate the claims. You haven't explained how this is a lie as opposed to a reasonable difference of opinion as to characterization. And you haven't explained how this affects the credibility of his claims (or, more importantly, the credibility of W's claims).
His wife was in the CIA, the CIA was looking for people with experience in the field and in the subject matter. Are you proposing a wall that separates what undercover CIA operatives learn in their peronals lives from their professional ones?
All you have done is call someone with a distinguished reord in foreign service a lying partisan hack. Go ahead. That meshes perfectly well with the style of stormtrooper, focus group oriented politics currently practiced by the Republican party. The intelligent voter is tired of this talking points bullshit.
So you still think Wilson lied about the details of how he came to the attention of the CIA? It's not like he deliberately misled a nation to whip them up into a fear-fueled frenzy for an ill-advised war or anything. Get some fucking perspective. Those of us who bought into the pre-war rhetoric (and that's all it turned out to be) because we were sure the administration knew something we didn't feel like we're left standing naked with panties on our heads and Lynndie just took our last cowby killer.
