Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
I still don't get it. I thought Berger was reviewing stuff that happened during the Clinton Administration, regarding Millenium activities that he (Berger) was involved in.
How, exactly, would such documents be a "predicate" for "lies and deception" in criticisms of Bush?
Nice "briefs" comment, though.
|
It also seems strange that using classified documents to attack the President would mean that your attack was built on lies and deception.
Unless they were classified drafts of Bush's pre-war speeches, of course.
