Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
In a bit of timing irony, the legal discussions surrounding this topic are taking on the exact same focus as the Plame affair -
namely, was the (CIA outing/removal of highly classifed docs) illegal per se, or was the intent of the party relevant to the equation.
Of course, all the notable players have flipped sides.
eta: And with this post, my total has finally reached anno domini 2004.
|
Granted, I've been tied up all day and may have missed something, but isn't this an easy question to answer once we now what substance was contained in the removed documents? If non-damaging, seems like the proferred explanation is plausible, and vice versa, no?
