LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 4,449
0 members and 4,449 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-23-2004, 02:42 AM   #310
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
more Berger weirdness

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I'm not doubting what they said publicly. Buy look to the words in the Report

Page 48

"Later on August 20, Navy vessels in the Arabian Sea fired their cruise missiles. Though most of them hit their intended targets, neither Bin Ladin nor any other terrorist leader was killed. Berger told us that an after-action review by Director Tenet concluded that the strikes had killed 20–30 people in the camps but probably missed Bin Ladin by a few hours. Since the missiles headed for Afghanistan had had to cross Pakistan, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs was sent to meet with Pakistan’s army chief of staff to assure him the missiles were not coming from India. Officials in Washington speculated that one or another Pakistani official might have sent a warning to the Taliban or Bin Ladin. (Footnote 46)"
___

46. NSC email, Clarke to Kerrick,“Timeline,”Aug. 19, 1998; Samuel Berger interview (Jan. 14, 2004). We did not find documentation on the after-action review mentioned by Berger. On Vice Chairman Joseph Ralston’s mission in Pakistan, see William Cohen interview (Feb. 5, 2004). For speculation on tipping off the Taliban, see, e.g., Richard Clarke interview (Dec. 18, 2003).[my bolding]

Sorry - this clearly infers they didn't see EVERYTHING.
Implies? Have you been drinking? Or have you dumbed down?
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.