Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
The right-to-life argument is that embryos should not be destroyed. The creation of new embryos solely for future destruction takes it one step further.
|
Fair enough, but it's an internally inconsistent argument. The embryos would be effectively destroyed anyway. Is there perceived value from the RTLs that having a frozen embryo that will never be implanted is of some value? Who runs this movement, John Henry Williams?
