LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 102
0 members and 102 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-28-2004, 04:33 PM   #583
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
The Analysis From a Dissident Catholic Democrat

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Of course. I said "coherent" theory. Anything that talks about a sliding scale and balancing rights is probably non-religious, but it's also not coherent, except in the law school sense that it will provide some future court with some mumbo jumbo to justify a result. The idea that "life" (whatever that means) begins at conception, or that there is a discernable day at which one goes from "non-objectionable medical procedure" to "murder," is necessarily spiritual in nature.
Interesting definitions of both coherent and religious.

Can you give me a coherent, non-religious analysis of how to distinguish between a minor and an adult for purposes of laws against statutory rape and pedophilia? Do you think there is a non-religious basis for jailing practicing NAMBLA types?
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 AM.