Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Yes, to flesh out your wholly irrelevant hypo, please add that that, despite the rapist's passionate pleas to abort, she decides to keep it and punish him with 18 years of financial obligation.
|
My guess is if a man were raped (and could prove it) and a baby were to result, if the rapist went to court asking for child support, the court would not order it. Moreover, if the rapee could prove it, wouldn't the mother be in jail?
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Get back to my question. The woman can abort for mere inconvenience. If the man has no say in the matter (which may or may not be fair), then he should not be obligated by the law to have any further financial responsibility.
|
This completely ignores the welfare of the child. You are as bad as the pro-choice crowd that ignore the fetus' rights. You know, pregnancy is not just about a mother and a father's rights. There is a fucking child involved.
