LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 111
0 members and 111 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-28-2004, 07:56 PM   #663
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
Funny

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
[rhetorical question] Why do you wish to argue with me about this in response to the story I told? [/rhetorical question]
Because you seem to feel compassion for a child once it is born so I wonder if you feel the same compassion for a child right before it is born.

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
I would certainly be enraged if that were done for any reason other than saving the life of the mother of that fetus. In whcih case, its arguably a selfish choice, but hers to make.
Most 3rd trimester abortions are not done to save the life of the mother.

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Yet at the same time, I note that if I were empowered to choose for that 8 month old fetus either your scenario or the one I described (about a year farther down the road), I would choose your scenario every time. Much quicker and less painful.
Ok then, do you get enraged if someone crushes the head of an infant or hacks it to death with a scalpel? I do.

The woman who left her infant to die could have given the child up for adoption. Your "abortion is necessary because we don't take care of unwanted children" argument is ludicrous. People go to China and Romania and Guatemala to adopt infants in this country. She could have given the baby up for adoption and it would have been taken care of.


Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Go away, Troll.
By your definition, troll is one who smashes your argument to bits and pieces and made you look like a fool. Fool.
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 PM.