LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,860
0 members and 1,860 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-29-2004, 10:59 AM   #713
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Dead Babies (Not Bob is 900!!!!!)

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
I didn't say that. All I did was wonder how many would agree to a pregnancy if that technology existed.

Well let me ask you then. If your wife was pregnant and both you and she wanted the baby but she had a heart condition that made carrying the baby very risky for her and for the baby. So much so that the odds were greater that both she and the baby would die if she tried to carry it to term. If there were a way for the baby to be implanted into you and you could much more safely carry the baby to term, would you agree to it? Be honest.
I'd do it. But I'd do just about anything for her. But I wouldn't like it, and I wouldn't do it for the child's sake.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.