LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 113
0 members and 113 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-04-2004, 04:34 PM   #1166
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Gangsta.

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
IF, however, each person were provided with a $300 stipend (tax free) with which to purchase health insurace as part of their employment package, how many would use the full $300 for health care?

And if there were no obligation/expectation to pay that $300 stipend, how many more people would the employer hire, either part time or full time?
I would guess that most would pay for health care. But people don't want the extra $300. They want heir employer to bargain for them collectively so they only have to pay $225.

And for your latter point, if your BIGLAW firm didn't have to pay some essentially worthless first-year $150,000 in salary, how many more lawyers could they hire? That's what the market demands. Don't enjoy its advantages if you can't live with its burdens.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.