Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
So he voted against the $87 million. What are you trying to prove with this post? That he and 11 other senators wanted to fund the troops a different way? Fine, and maybe his way was better (I honestly don't know), but when it came down to supporting the troops or protesting, he protested. Sound familiar?
|
By that logic, the White House is equally to blame, since it was willing to cut off the troops to further its domestic tax policy. But since we all know that the troops were going to be funded, and that only dispute was about how to pay for it, either attack is equally beside the point. Saying that Kerry would have failed to fund the troops is ignorant.
