LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 107
0 members and 107 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-11-2004, 02:25 AM   #11
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Right. Because the Swift Vets would have gone away if Kerry had made that statement, and the media would have quickly gone back to discussing more important stories.
I can only speak for myself, but I have reason to believe that my thinking processes aren't THAT much different than most other peoples'. I find Kerry's initial denial that he'd ever claimed to have been in Cambodia for Christmas, followed by a "we'll get back to you", and then followed by silence, to constitute something more than a simple "this is so stoopid I ain't even gonna reply". And I also think that his "staff's" initial denial, in the face of all of this new shit coming out, would NEVER have been the result of a casual off-the-cuff "oh, yeah, right". Every word on this stuff is being vetted back to Kerry.

Quote:
Just like Glenn Reynolds attacked the Rassmann piece as not saying enough, his attackers will never be satisfied. There's no point engaging them because it's about the charge, not the verdict.
God, I'd HATE to have to live through such a chapter in a campaign, wouldn't you?

"Delicious." That word just keeps popping into my mind. There truly IS justice. I am renewed.

Quote:
It's enough to make a conservative regret what they did to Bill Clinton, eh?
You really can't make that leap to owning your own regret, can you? (Hint: try "liberal", and "Bush".)
bilmore is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM.