LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 178
0 members and 178 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-18-2004, 03:09 PM   #2121
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Hank, you da man!

Quote:
Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
By antiwar, do you mean anti all war? By the way you phrase the question, it seems you think it's hypocritical for anyone opposed to war to vote for anyone who would be willing to go to war. Since all electable presidential candidates have to be willing to go to war, this would mean that all antiwar folks are pretty much disqualified from having an impact on any presidential election, sicne they would be stuck voting for the Feng Shui party every time. That seems odd.
Don't try and do your clever lawyers tricks on me. Kerry didn't generically say he may support a hypothetical war. He and the Democratic party said they specifically support the war in Iraq. He only quibbles about how- ie bring in Frenchy. My question is how can you who are against Bush because of the war support Kerry.

Your cheap bullshit arguments are beneath you Larry. This is the kind of crap arguments I'd expect from Ty.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 PM.