LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 160
0 members and 160 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-20-2004, 12:36 PM   #2332
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Slate fisks the Swift Vets.

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me

Thus, it appears your logic would still hold, though the wealthy were still paying far more in percentage and absolute terms.

Which is absurd. Almost everyone got a break compared to the old system. The wealthy still pay a far higher proportion of their income as taxes. Sure, the wealthy got a better break in absolute terms and relative to the old system.
It appears that Wonk believes the tax burden should be on a one-way ratchet, allowing only for increases in the burden borne by the wealthy, regardless of whether there have been other increases recently. Marx would agree.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.