LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,169
0 members and 1,169 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-27-2004, 03:11 PM   #348
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
No Red Pens

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
This is surprising. You like papers better and therefore tests aren't a good measure of intelligence? I never would have guessed that you might feel that way. I will display my superior test-taking intelligence by refusing to debate you on this one.
That's not really the logical conclusion of my post, but I guess it's okay to miss this, since I wasn't testing you.

Tests often test your ability to remember something and spit it back. They usually aren't designed to find out how you think about something or even the real process behind your thoughts and answers. That is why I say they are limited in what they actually test. They are a good measure of a certain kind of intelligence. Do I have to add, "in my opinion" to everything?

In my opinion, I think papers require you to use lots of different types of skills.

I can't believe that you would translate my post into "test takers are dumber than paper writers." Whatever.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.