LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,012
0 members and 3,012 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-30-2004, 04:12 PM   #2995
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
IOC and Bush

Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
If there is one thing that I feel strongly about, it's that patent attorneys should stick to patents and stay the fuck away from trademark and copyright law.
Heh. 2.

Quote:
Correct, at least for consumer software and mass market business software. For custom stuff, not so much.
2. (As an aside, you can probably count on both hands the number of tech companies that go through the trouble of filing for copyright protection in their software, legal advice notwithstanding.)

Quote:
Besides the recent actions of the Justice Department, the last reported criminal case of which I am aware in copyright is from the '70s and reads like a rejected script for Starsky and Hutch. It sounds good in the demand letters, but its a pretty empty threat.
There were a couple of (failed) DMCA cases recently, but fair point anyway. Those cases read like rejected scripts also.

It's all a moot point anyway -- copyright protection is useful largely to deter blatant pirates, and those too lazy to rewrite the code without wholesale copying. The real problem ahead, unfortunately, is in patents.

****

And how'd we get sucked into this stupid topic, anyway? First day of the RNC, and this is the best stuff they can bring?
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.