Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
I didn't ignore your point. I didn't fully grasp it. Non-competitive bidding in such cases makes sense. However, there are numerous contracts where your point on proprietary technological superiority doesn't apply. In such cases, there really isn't any reason for not using competitive bidding.
|
Okay, but Miller was talking about new weapons systems that Kerry voted against, not how we bought bolts or bricks. So Kerry's votes had nothing to do with non-competitive bidding.
