LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 175
0 members and 175 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-07-2004, 12:58 PM   #3683
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Okay, so then is the answer to kill only fundamentalist Christians now, and thereby keep them from getting their momentum up, or do we wait for them to become a bigger menace and then kill all christians who fail to affirmatively act against them?

Should we take them out on a geographical basis (just nuke Idaho and the Southeast) or should we establish a tribunal (nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition)? Or are you going to suggest that the same rule which you seem to think makes so much sense for the Arab world doesn't apply to white folks?
Careful, Wonk, talking analytically about terrorism never got anyone any points, and that's what this is all about. This analytical garbage might help you understand and combat terrorism, and might help us come up with a strategy that works, but that is very much what this is NOT about.

God, why won't these Democrats get tough on terrorists and just nuke somebody. All the softies do is talk, talk, talk. (Oh, yeh, and occassionally win bronze stars).
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 PM.