Quote:
Originally posted by viet_mom
I would be interested in what the stated policy is behind the legislation (or maybe it's a regulation but there might be some regulatory history on it). If the rule (applicable to kids over 5) is meant to deter sexuality between children, and the rule applies to foster kids as opposed to non-foster kids, there might be an assumption that a six year old would be more likely to end up in a sexual act with a non-blood related child than a six year old biologically related to the other child(ren).
|
given that aticus' sister eventually had to get a restraining order against him, (when she was 14!) it is sort or either ironic or maybe sick that he's the one bringing up this distinction.
