LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 107
0 members and 107 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-12-2004, 01:57 PM   #4264
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
LA Times

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Go in heavy to what end? We don't have enough troops there to properly occupy the area, even if our political leadership was willing to take the heat for the casualties that would result. We cannot occupy Iraq with the troops we have there, and the Iraqi forces cannot take up the slack, so we're stuck letting part of the country be controlled by insurgents.
We don't necessarily have to occupy the area. We do have to go house-to-house, seize any weapons and ammunition, kill or arrest any combatants, and route out any communications or strategic assets the insurgents have.

If that means more troops, then so be it. The plain and simple fact is that we have to commit to being there or we have to leave. We cannot accept letting insurgents control part of the country or we'll be at a stalemate indefinitely.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.