LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 94
0 members and 94 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-13-2004, 09:03 PM   #4379
Say_hello_for_me
Theo rests his case
 
Say_hello_for_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: who's askin?
Posts: 1,632
general pet peeve (comments from Chicagoans?)

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
eta (by club) partially, but partially responding to his compulsory argument.
Right now (I think) they say, if you take 1, you have to take as many as people have. Supposedly, its one of the great motivators for going condo in gentrifying neighborhoods (getting out of the section 8 program as values rise). How is it a taking if you state merely that people can't discriminate based on the section 8 status itself? The landlords still get the same market reimbursement they demand.

And I'm not sure, but I'd like to think you aren't arguing against my ban on the use of such vouchers in concentration.

Maybe I'm confused though. What compulsion/coercion do you object to?
__________________
Man, back in the day, you used to love getting flushed, you'd be all like 'Flush me J! Flush me!' And I'd be like 'Nawww'

Say_hello_for_me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.