LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 96
0 members and 96 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-13-2004, 09:10 PM   #4380
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
general pet peeve (comments from Chicagoans?)

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Right now (I think) they say, if you take 1, you have to take as many as people have. Supposedly, its one of the great motivators for going condo in gentrifying neighborhoods (getting out of the section 8 program as values rise). How is it a taking if you state merely that people can't discriminate based on the section 8 status itself? The landlords still get the same market reimbursement they demand.

And I'm not sure, but I'd like to think you aren't arguing against my ban on the use of such vouchers in concentration.

Maybe I'm confused though. What compulsion/coercion do you object to?
Disclaimer - I am ignorant in this area. But what I object to is compusory aspect of this. I think landlords should be able to rent to whomever they like, period. I also do not like the idea of government planning in the market place, for what I believe are obvious reasons.

That said, I don't necessarily disagree with the effects you believe your plan would have, but I would be pissed off as hell if a landlord in my building or next door decided to acept vouchers. Tell me, would the government compensate me for any dimunition in my propery value?
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.