|
NYT readers not misinformed
Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
I think the gelding calls are based, not on being suckered by a fake, but on being so openly and aggressively partisan that he is willing to suspend normal good journalistic practices to try and sway voters with what he knows is crap but that he presents as reliable. Look at his continued defense - that's not a sign of continuing good-faith belief in the provenance of the docs, but a continuing willingness to push his ideology to the exclusion of all other considerations.
I want his balls, not for negligence, but for an intentional act.
|
He thinks the story is larger than those two documents -- after all, they got GOP-leaning witnesses to say that the contents of the forged documents matched what they knew -- but and you and your conservative pals are doing your utmost to change the focus from the larger story, which makes the President look bad, to the narrow question of the provenance of the two documents. There's an element of truth to each position.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
