LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 158
0 members and 158 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-15-2004, 04:24 PM   #4538
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
More Flipper

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
It means that the President was authorized to use force in his discretion. It was not a referendum on whether we should invade. The President pitched it this way at the time. Recall that the vote was months before the war started.
And if Kerry gave the president this unfettered discretion, when he really didn't mean it to be unfettered, shouldn't he be held accountable?

Quote:
Voted on what? But I agree with you -- since most voters are, like you, apparently unable to appreciate the distinctions I'm drawing, Kerry's not helping himself.
The resolution. These distinction are monday morning quarterbacking for political purposes. I deal in the world of advise and consent everyday. If Kerry did not agree that the president should have this discretion, or wanted other conditions tied to the approval, they should have been written into the document.
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.