LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 95
0 members and 95 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-15-2004, 08:09 PM   #4601
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
More Flipper

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
No it doesn't, unless that condition is specifically set forth in the resolution. If his support for authorization was conditional, then he should not have voted for an unconditional approval.
When Congress passes a law criminalizing certain behavior, this is not seen as a statement that the behavior must be punished in all circumstances. We all still understand that prosecutors have some discretion in how they do their job.

And you are twisted words beyond their recognition. Kerry's support for authorization wasn't conditional. His support for a war was. If Saddam Hussein had converted to Christianity and free trade and thrown his borders open to Southern Baptists and Wall Street Journal vendors, there isn't a Senator who would have supported a war, but not one of them voted to limit the authorization accordingly.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.