Quote:
Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
This seems like a congressional limitation to me. Why couldn't a congressperson argue with a straight face that the admin could have relied on further peaceful means to enforce the UN resos without jeopardizing our safety, and therefore what Bush did with the authority was not what was meant when they voted on it?
|
Because they expressly left that judgement call to his determination. They could argue that he made the judgement call in bad faith, but that one would be difficult to pass the straight face test. I note further that they didn't qualify that the determination be reasonable, which is what I would have expected.
