LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 108
0 members and 108 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-17-2004, 11:37 AM   #4751
Say_hello_for_me
Theo rests his case
 
Say_hello_for_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: who's askin?
Posts: 1,632
Coupla thoughts

1.) So does this mean we all do sorta agree that states should be able to decide this an all similar issues?

2.) Completely unrelated. Not so long ago, 2 Russians were arrested for killing a rebel Chechen leader in Dubai or something. This leads to a couple of questions. a.) Do we support Russia threatening Dubai (even though they are our ally) and b.) do we support Russia adopting our doctrine and threatening anyone who supports terrorists who threaten Russia?

The thing on 2b is, I'm generally in support of any nation being able to attack threatening terrorists in another nation. However, some of the harboring nations are our allies (as has been discussed ad nauseum here before) when they harbor our own enemies. I'm thinking this is a great way for Putin to solidly align Russia with the U.S., while also allowing us to exert even more pressure on our allies to deal with the jackasses they harbor. Of course, I'm looking forward to Britain threatening us over the IRA, but that's another story. All in all, I think this Russia thingy could be good for us, but I hope the WH is paying attention and trying to figure out how to do the right thing while still leveraging this to our benefit (and not necessarily to Russia's detriment).

Hello
__________________
Man, back in the day, you used to love getting flushed, you'd be all like 'Flush me J! Flush me!' And I'd be like 'Nawww'

Say_hello_for_me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.