http://www.latimes.com/news/politics...home-headlines
The AP story in the LA Times was posted at 3:19 (pacific?) and indicates that the first of the bloggers to publicly question the authenticity of the Killian memos based on technical stuff is a GA (Georgia) lawyer who might accurately be described as a conservative activist.
1.) He ain't doing interviews;
2.) He posted a technical deconstruction 4 hours after the CBS story ran.
Both of which raise flags. But neither of which answers the questions of a.) motive (preempting the overall story?) or b.) how he could engineer CBS and its chief democratic mouthpiece describing the documents as coming from an unimpeachable source.
I'm not sure what to think of the LA Times information, though I know it doesn't do one thing to absolve CBS and Rather.
Hello
