|
interesting (seriously)
Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics...home-headlines
The AP story in the LA Times was posted at 3:19 (pacific?) and indicates that the first of the bloggers to publicly question the authenticity of the Killian memos based on technical stuff is a GA (Georgia) lawyer who might accurately be described as a conservative activist.
1.) He ain't doing interviews;
2.) He posted a technical deconstruction 4 hours after the CBS story ran.
Both of which raise flags. But neither of which answers the questions of a.) motive (preempting the overall story?) or b.) how he could engineer CBS and its chief democratic mouthpiece describing the documents as coming from an unimpeachable source.
I'm not sure what to think of the LA Times information, though I know it doesn't do one thing to absolve CBS and Rather.
Hello
|
Democrats have been repeating the story of how Karl Rove planted a bug in the office his own candidate to engineer a story that sucked all of the oxygen out of the campaign. But I thought that was pretty much paranoid thinking until I read this post.
A blogger who doesn't want to talk to the press or blow his own horn? Definitely very, very suspicious.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
