LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 103
0 members and 103 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-20-2004, 10:13 AM   #4920
Say_hello_for_me
Theo rests his case
 
Say_hello_for_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: who's askin?
Posts: 1,632
On the other, other hand

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
Ok, so in your mind, it is not as credible as a blog, but it is your liberal paper of record:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/20/po...rint&position=

So was it really Bush who lied? LOL!!!!!

From the article:

>>Yesterday, Emily J. Will, a document specialist who inspected the records for CBS News and said last week that she had raised concerns about their authenticity with CBS News producers, confirmed a report in Newsweek that a producer had told her that the source of the documents said they had been obtained anonymously and through the mail<<

I don't buy into the whole Rove thing, but I've gotta wonder if the anonymous mail was postmarked GA (i.e., maybe 4 hours was a bit quick... I'm dying to see if anyone knows how quickly the documents were even made available for inspection over the internet). It looks like the two positions are dovetailing nicely, for the moment. As a guess at the broader picture though, I'd suggest the evidence only implicates Burkett in the end.

Hello
__________________
Man, back in the day, you used to love getting flushed, you'd be all like 'Flush me J! Flush me!' And I'd be like 'Nawww'

Say_hello_for_me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.