In an article in the local rag yesterday, the author tries to argue that Kerry's position on Iraq has been (mostly) consistent, yet he ends with this:
Quote:
For a candidate who has been in elected office nearly a quarter of a century, Kerry has at times shown a remarkable inability to explain the nuances of his position.
Asked by radio host Don Imus last week to explain how he could be so critical of the war yet stand by his vote to authorize the use of force, Kerry responded with a 324-word answer, including a discussion of no-fly zones and Iraqi tribal separatism.
The response left Imus -- a self-described Kerry supporter -- perplexed.
"I was just back in my office banging my head on the jukebox,'' Imus told listeners when the interview was over. "This is my candidate, and ... I don't know what he's talking about.''
|
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGQK8TI8O1.DTL
