Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I have said many times that I think this will be a close race (absent a complete drubbing this Thursday). But I do think that Bush will win, and I'm happy about this for many reasons, one of which is that we won't have to hear from the frenchman again for a while (or at least until 2006, if he pulls an Al Gore).
I'm sure, however, that the left will have innumerable excuses for the lost (e.g., the swiftvets, Florida, Kerry didn't go negative enough, etc.). So I'd like you people to go on the record with your excusses now, so that we won't have backfill later. If Kerry should lose, what are the excuses?
efs
|
There are no excuses. He's the worst candidate of all time.
The anemic left's current campaign of "Its not Kerry's fault that he's thoughtful and complex (see: longwinded and scatterbrained) - the problem is with the stupid American voters and their 30 sec attention spans" is probably the worst band-aid that could be applied. "So, how should we address the fact that John can't shorten his message to a good soundbite? Hmmm... lets call the audience stupid. Then they'll listen." Carville must be downing bourbons buy the half-dozen. He'll be lucky to have a job handicapping city council races on local cable after the damage being connected with this lead zeppelin of a campaign does to his name...*
* Hindenberg is my preferred analogy, but Kerry's never been airborn.
