Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Either you are joking or you just proved my point abput the angry left.
Ty took a pass because I think my last little jibe hit too close to home.
This board is a prime example of people compartmentalizing the definition of "win" and missing the bigger picture. Whats a "win" in law? Being the smartest smarty pants with every fact and cite at the ready and appearing the smartest in the room at all times? Of course it is, you risk averse good little lawyer, you. Now, I may be a peacock, and I'm exactly the full of shit salesman you might loathe, but people remember me, and that gets even a young screwhead like me a little bit of business here and there, which the lefty kid sitting in the corner afraid to sound stupid ain't getting. But of course, you'll service whatever business is brought in much better than me. And thats good. For you. But my definition of winning is different than yours. I actually get a much bigger kick out of landing a client than I do in any other endeavor. Its only because I'm bored silly behind a desk that I even write on these boards.
People give money to people based on personality as much as skill. People vote on the same criteria. That may offend you intellectually, but denying it is pretty damn stupid. Stop. Thinking. Like. Such. A. Lawyer.
|
Once again, you miss the point. I think you are convinced that you are good at things that I do not think you're good at. That clear enough for you?
Hell, I'm not angry at people who are good at those things. Good for them. I'm not even angry at you. But you ain't one of them.
If you were, you wouldn't take every opportunity to tell everyone on this board about it, would you? You would know it was obvious to the rest of us.
TM
