Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Let me get this straight.
You want to ignore the plain language and look to the "implication"
Whenver Kerry says crap about a "global test", you want us to ignore the implications and look to the actual words he says.
Just trying to keep track here.
|
Dude, you're saying Cheney was in the cafeteria most Tuesdays and didn't run into Edwards, so that means Edwards is a non-entity in the Senate? If Cheney's point wasn't that he was presiding over Senate sessions
and had never met Edwards, what the fuck was his point?
It's a perennial problem in litigation: after all the contortions you make to make your client's statement technically true, you've coincidentally made it irrelevant to your client's case.
