LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,050
0 members and 2,050 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-07-2004, 12:44 PM   #1688
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,280
Ha!

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Just curious - how does this differ from the normal "I'll vote for your pork if you vote for mine" dance?
You can read the report http://www.house.gov/ethics/Medicare_Report.pdf

Quote:
The Investigative Subcommittee also found that Majority Leader Tom DeLay offered to endorse Representative Smith's son in exchange for Representative Smith's vote in favor for the Medicare Bill. In the view of the Investigative Subcommittee, this conduct could support a finding that Majority Leader DeLay violated House rules. The Investigative Subcommittee concluded that it is improper for a Member to offer or link support for the personal interests of another Member as part of a quid pro quo to achieve a legislative goal.
Presumably, pork has a benefit to the other member's constituancy. A deal like this one only benefits the member (and in this case, his immediate family).
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 AM.