Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
I think that these guys were among the ones that the "source" tried to peddle the story to before s/he wandered into the alley and found a soiled, drunken Novak.
I don't know if the source also tried WaTimes or FNC or not, and I don't follow why Novak's never been served with a subpoena, either, so I agree there are gaps here that don't make much sense.
|
I thought this all basically got mooted out by the findings concerning Plame's true role in getting hubby named as the PI on the ground for the investigation. Didn't that finding make it fairly impossible to prove the intent (or was it motivation) aspect of the statute?
