Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
As Twain said, there are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics. What kind of asshole would even for a moment take seriously a mathematical progression as a likely scenario for terrorist casualties? Give me a fucking break.
|
Well, I don't know? What kind of an asshole would assert that massive casualties is not_going_to_happen when they already have? Who in the fuck does not understand how much is at stake here, when both candidates agreed that MWD is the greatest threat to America? The whole point of an MWD is to cause mass casualties, and our choice is to elect someone who will minimize this possibility without surrendering our independence to France or directly to the Islamicists.
If we can't agree that mass-casualties are at stake, and that this became particularly clear after 9/11, there is really no point in continuing this with you.
If we can agree, please feel free to let me know what Kerry will do to minimize this possibility (i.e., please address the question I posed to SAM).
Hello
