Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Not the topic at hand, but what about the "rights" of the putative father? Does he get a vote? Or does she unilaterally get the control of his wallet for 18 years?
Ask this question to any number of childless parents out there desperately trying to adopt.
Tell this to the "unwashed" middle class manufacturing, contruction and service industry employees, that, in on particular order, delivered yyou your paper, picked your orange juice, turned on your plumbing. sold you your suit, built you your car and directed the traffic to your shiny, tall office building.
When did you turn into such a classist fucking snob?
If anything, it would alleviate the need for illegal immigration.
How does Philly vote again?
Better yet, maybe you can convince them that terrorism is only a "nuisance" on the level of prostitution.
|
1. He gets a vote, but the person with the uterus gets veto power.
2. Neither of us has adoption stats, so I'm not going to argue on an issue neither of us can really speak to. No, I'm not googling the issue. I don't have all week to toy with you on this.
3. You misunderstood me. I meant that a child coming into the world should be given all advantages. You're advocating they be brought in to wash dishes? Its honorable work, but is that really your point?
4. I'm not classist. I just look down my nose at "traditionalists". I reserved that right. Act like a person 100 years ago and I'll ascribe the degree of enlightment a person had 100 years ago to you.
5. OK, so the argument is the aborted would be better off doing menail tasks for the rest of us. Who's classist again? I don't need a servant.
6. Terrorism is a nuisance. Its a horrific horrible nuisance. It could kill you, like many other things. What that has to do with this argument is beyond me, but I figured I'd better answer, to be "consistent" for Hello's sake.
