Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
This explains it all. We shouldn't have attacked Iraq in the late 1980's when Saddam Hussein was murdering babies but we had a good relationship with him. We should have attacked him later when he was still murdering babies but our relationship had deteriorated. Thanks for the moral clarity!
|
The missing part being that we tried your beloved sanctions first before invading. Tell me again how much you liked the results of those sanctions, Ty. Or that as bad as they were, at least there were no "civilian war casualties", right? Much better to be a "sanctions casualty" than a "civilian war casualty." I'm sure the dead kids know the difference.
