LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 138
0 members and 138 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-15-2004, 04:55 PM   #3503
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I'm not concerned with the actually number, only the substance underlying it. I don't have the links handy, but Kerry has been voted among the worst senators on taxes by those organizations (e.g., Jarvis) who track such things. Are you disputing this? Or are you disputing that that may be true but substatively his positions are moderate?
I'm not familiar with Jarvis.

Realize that "taxes" and fiscal discpline are two different things. If you're looking at rankings from an organization whose view is focused entirely on cutting taxes, my bet is they're going to calibrate votes based on the Republican's parties chosen pet issues.

Let's look at a couple of votes that mattered. Gramm-Rudman passed 61-31, with Kerry voting in favor of it. That was a fundamental and defining vote on fiscal discpline that many Democrats objected to. So, is he a liberal there? Is the label meaningful?

Welfare reform. He voted in favor of a fundamental overhaul of Welfare limiting benefit periods. Backed by Clinton, opposed by many liberals, and a major piece of legislation. Liberal? Meaningful label?
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 PM.