Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
1.) Who?
2.) That last sentence should say that's why I'm voting against Bush. Its one thing to point to principles of conservatism that are allegedly being violated by Bush (I say allegedly because conservatives are not opposed to bringing Democracy anywhere feasible where it serves our interests... see his magnet-for-terrorists comment), and it would be something entirely different if he could point to even a single redeeming quality of Kerry. You guys got a Republican equivalent of Zell Miller (i.e., someone relevant) who supports Kerry, or are we going to hear from the son of Reagan's milkman in the '30s as the election gets closer.
Have a good day my good man.
Hello
|
I haven't gone looking for prominent names, but I'm more interested in logic than names anyway.
A friend of mine who describes himself as conservative and who was a staunch Romney backer in the last gubernatorial election here phrased it pretty succinctly recently when he said that he would rather elect someone he disagrees with who is competant than someone he agrees with who is incompetant. His view was that when someone fails a 4 year job interview, you take your chance on the next acceptable candidate even if they graduated from the wrong school. He's one of the people who has convinced me that George Bush is no conservative.
Take it for what it is worth.
