Forums

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
No, but you Republicans should feel happy for having diverted attention from Bush's feat of losing three straight debates.



And a GOP activist.



Yes, but Bush isn't concerned about this.



No more so than President Flip-Flop.



You said it.



Not in any material way, but if a large number of Republicans spend a large sum of money to convince you otherwise, who knows?



Exactly, but the real point is to win an election by demonizing gays and lesbians (like Cheney's daughter), not to change the Constitution.



Yes, and very, very marginal. As in, less marginal than lots of other ways the same money could have been used.



No, there's still time for a Democratic president to try to right things.



See, e.g., Calvin Coolidge.



But if Bush wins, you'll be hearing about the "crisis" in support of a privatization plan.



Unless you get sick, in which case things look less rosy.



Unless you get sick, in which case things look less rosy.



Unless you get sick, in which case things look less rosy.



No, they're greasing the wheels so that industry can do it.



[insert obvious rejoinder here]



No, but Republicans spending $$$ on ads can invent their own reality.



No.



No, but morons will always confuse dissent in a democracy with such things.



No. See, e.g., Fallujah.



We'll find out come January.

RT insists I ask you if you have a PayPal account. Do you?