LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 138
0 members and 138 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-18-2004, 12:54 PM   #3675
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Abortion redux

Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
There was an editorial on Sunday in the Houston Chronicle (and, I assume, other papers) about abortion rates and the Bush administration. The authors were a professor of Christian ethics (who, with his wife, chose not to terminate a pregnancy after she had contracted Ruella in the first trimester and consequently had a blind child) and an investigative journalist.

They found that abortion rates, which had been falling steadily in the 1990s began to increase (in Colorado, dramatically) since Bush went into office. They cite a few reasons for this: decline in income, increase in unemployment, lack of health insurance, and lack of social services. Ultimately, they conclude that economic factors are heavily tied to abortion rates and people who care about abortion should consider it separately from other domestic issues.

They just stop short of endorsing Kerry, but they certainly reference him:



http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory...utlook/2851283
Is there a "not" missing in the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph of your post? Or am I still germ-infested, and missing something?
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 PM.