LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,596
0 members and 1,596 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-18-2004, 10:26 PM   #3814
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Pot to kettle: You're black!

Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
The problem with the system in paragraph 1 is the "most people", since those who are not "most" will likely end up needing to be supported somewhere. The portion of these financial costs born by the government has to be factored in, and the social costs have to be considered.

The problem with paragraph 2 is practical - you'll lose public support.
I'm not disagreeing with what you say. However, I think that the expenditure of supporting the people in paragraph 1 would be lower overall than the cost of paying social security to all recipients under the current system.

I agree with your assessment of paragraph2, which is why I am not running for Congress.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.