Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
1) By all accounts other than the NYT, the material was moved before the invasion began.
2) The material at issue was required to be destroyed by Saddam under the umpteen UN Security Council Resolutions that he was ignoring. The IAEA did nothing about it.
|
1. So what?
2. See # 1.
We're not back to Saddam being a danger because he violated UN Resolutions again?
As an aside, the Right's been arguing that Kerry is weak because he'd listen to the UN, yet the chief basis a lot of Righties cite as the basis for the Iraq War is that Saddam refused to listen to the UN. Isn't it a little inconsistent to whack Kerry for following the UN at the same time you're whacking Saddam for not following the UN?