LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 851
0 members and 851 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-25-2004, 04:09 PM   #4856
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
1) By all accounts other than the NYT, the material was moved before the invasion began.

2) The material at issue was required to be destroyed by Saddam under the umpteen UN Security Council Resolutions that he was ignoring. The IAEA did nothing about it.
1. So what?

2. See # 1.

We're not back to Saddam being a danger because he violated UN Resolutions again?

As an aside, the Right's been arguing that Kerry is weak because he'd listen to the UN, yet the chief basis a lot of Righties cite as the basis for the Iraq War is that Saddam refused to listen to the UN. Isn't it a little inconsistent to whack Kerry for following the UN at the same time you're whacking Saddam for not following the UN?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 10-25-2004 at 04:29 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.